Introduction
©
EWB Engineering, LLC |
There
are many risks associated with the infrared inspection of
electrical equipment. Those risks include not only shock,
but burn injuries from arc blasts. Arc flash accidents can
cause serious burns and in some cases death. The risks
associated with an arc flash were first introduced to the industry
by Ralph Lee in the early 1980’s with his publication of, "The
Other Electrical Hazard: Electric Arc Blast Burns." The
risk of an arc flash occurring is real and statistics show
that there are 5 to 10 serious arc flash incidents everyday
in North America. These incidents result in approximately 2,000
workers being treated in burn centers annually. Many more workers
suffer less severe injuries resulting in only emergency room
treatment. It is estimated that these incidents cost organizations
hundreds of millions of dollars annually.
| The risk of an arc flash occurring
is real and statistics show that there are 5 to 10 serious
arc flash incidents everyday in North America. These
incidents result in approximately 2,000 workers being
treated in burn centers annually. |
Safety standards adopted by the NFPA
and OSHA provide workers with guidelines for reducing risk
while inspecting electrical equipment. At the heart of these
guidelines is the NFPA 70E, which is a standard that outlines
electrical safety requirements that are necessary for safeguarding
employees during various workplace activities, including not
only safe practices, but proper protective equipment based
on risk. The 2009 edition of this standard includes new information
intended to further improve workplace safety.
back to top
The Hazards of Electrical Inspection

© Arc Flash Information Resource Center
|
Electrical
inspectors face many hazards. Hazards can occur from shock,
electrocution, arc flash, arc blast, and more. These dangers
are very real. In fact, every day in the US one person dies
from shock, electrocution, arc flash, and arc blast. Additionally,
some 8,000 workers are treated each year in emergency rooms
for electrical contact injuries.
Of these injuries, burns are the most common.
Burns can result from a variety of reasons including electrical
burn, arc burn, or thermal contact burn. Of these, electrical
burns are the most serious in nature and require immediate
medical attention.
Electrical burns result from the flow of electric current through tissue and/or
bone. The flow generates heat that damages tissue. Arc flash burns result from
the intense heat generated from the flash occurring near the victim’s body. Thermal
contact burns occur from contact with heated components.
back to top
What is an Arc Flash?
| An arc flash is a release of electrical energy that
can be hotter than the sun and more powerful than eight
sticks of dynamite. |
|
An arc flash is a release of electrical energy that can be
hotter than the sun and more powerful than eight sticks of
dynamite. An arc flash or fault is essentially a short circuit
(a phase to-phase or phase-to-ground fault) where the air becomes
the conductor. Arc flashes can be triggered by a variety of
conditions including:
- air movement
- dust,
- contact surface corrosion,
- racking of breakers,
- fuse replacement,
- loose connections,
- insulating material failure, and,
- conductor contact
© A+ Electrical Safety Equipment |
© Training Press Releases |
© Burlington Electrical
Testing |
An arc flash results from a rapid release
of energy occurring when there is sufficient voltage in an
electrical system and a path to either ground or a lower voltage
is present. The arc flash has to be started manually by something
either creating the path of conduction or a failure in a system
such as a breakdown in insulation. Generally, arc faults occur
in systems with a bus voltage in excess of 120 volts, as lower
voltage levels are not powerful enough to sustain an arc.
During the initial flash, the cause of the
fault normally burns away allowing for the sustainment of the
arc fault by the establishing of highly conductive plasma.
The resulting plasma arc will conduct as much energy as is
available, limited only by the impedance of the arc itself.
Arc flashes can vary in intensity and duration.
Because of the massive energy discharge, components can burn away vaporizing
the copper and causing an explosive volumetric increase in the arc blast, which
can be conservatively estimated as an expansion of 40,000 to 1. The resulting
fiery explosion creates deadly shrapnel heated to extreme levels that can destroy
everything in its path.
back to top
Who is the NFPA,
OSHA, and why do they care
about
worker safety?
NFPA
Founded in 1896, the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) is an international
nonprofit organization dedicated to reducing the worldwide population’s burden
on its quality of life resulting from fire and other hazards. The NFPA accomplishes
this by developing and advocating standards and consensus codes, in addition
to conducting research, training, and education.
The NFPA’s membership includes more than 80,000 professionals
from approximately 100 nations worldwide. The NFPA is responsible for as
many as 300 codes and standards that establish criteria for building, processing,
design, service, and installation of equipment in an effort to minimize the
risk and effects of fire and other hazards worldwide.
OSHA
The
Occupational Safety & Health Administration
(OSHA) is a federal agency that was founded in 1970 to ensure
that the safety and health concerns of all American workers
are being met. Since the agency was established, workplace
fatalities have dropped by 62 percent and injury rates
have declined by 40 percent. OSHA has accomplished this
by developing and enforcing workplace standards. Additionally,
OSHA provides training and educational programs for organizations
of all sizes.
The NFPA and OSHA work together to provide a safer workplace
for all. OSHA provides the legislation and regulations for worker safety
regarding electrical hazards. The NFPA’s role is to provide detailed guidance
of OSHA’s requirements. NFPA 70E details the electrical aspects of workplace
safety.
OSHA 1910.132(d), and 1926.28(a)
requires employers to assess electrical hazards in the workplace. Additionally,
they must select, have, and use the correct Personal Protective Equipment (PPE),
in addition to documenting the assessment. While OSHA does not enforce
the NFPA 70E, any employer that uses the standard for their hazard/risk
assessment, and follows the guidelines for PPE as stated in the NFPA 70E
standard is typically considered to be in compliance with the Hazard Assessment
and Equipment Selection OSHA Standard as well.

© Construction Book Express |

© The Electricity Forum |
Image courtesy of Dolphins Software |
back to top
The NFPA 70E is the standard for safe electrical work practices
published by the NFPA in response to OSHA safety requirements.
Compliance with NFPA 70e is voluntary; however, OSHA does reference
and recognize the standard.
The NFPA 70E’s goal is to protect electrical
safety professionals while working around devices capable of
generating an arc flash. Additionally, it provides detailed
safety practices for organizations that install, repair, and
maintain electrical systems.
| The NFPA 70E’s goal is to protect
electrical safety professionals while working around
devices capable of generating an arc flash. |
The NFPA 70E addresses four areas:
- safety related work practices,
- safety related maintenance requirements,
- safety requirements for special equipment, and,
- safety requirements for installation of equipment.
The NFPA 70E standard was originally released in 1979, and was
intended to assist OSHA in preparing a set of consensus standards
that could be used as a basis for evaluating electrical safety
in the workplace. Through the years, there have been several
revisions and the NFPA 70E Standard has become the standard
for safe work-practices throughout the world. The revision in
2000 clarified the PPE requirements and required flame resistant
clothing to protect workers from the hazards associated with
an arc flash. The most recent version also included PPE changes
that eliminated the allowance for cotton jeans and protective
eye glasses as acceptable for Level 1, specifying that PPE clothing
and a face shield are now required. Over the last nine years,
there have been several revisions each with updated protective
recommendations.
The
latest version, released in 2009, introduced several changes
including new PPE suggestions and most notably for thermographers
the addition of infrared thermography as a task noted in the
Hazard/Risk Classification (HRC) Table 130.7(C) (9).
Hazard
/ Risk Category |
Clothing
Description |
0 |
Non-melting,
flammable materials (i.e., untreated cotton, wool,
rayon, or silk, or blends of these materials) with
a fabric weight at least 4.5 oz/yd2 |
1 |
Arc-rated
FR shirt and FR pants or FR coverall |
2 |
Arc-rated
FR shirt and FR pants or FR coverall |
3 |
Arc-rated
FR shirt and pants or FR coverall, and arc flash
suit selected so that the system arc rating meets
the required minimum |
4 |
Arc-rated FR shirt and pants
or FR coverall, and arc flash suit selected so that
the system arc rating meets the required minimum |
Table of Hazard/Risk Categories for Protective Clothing |
| One of the most relevant changes for
infrared inspection workers is associated with work
permits for energized circuits. Previously, the standard
did not specify whether a work permit was required
for inspections that did not alter the enclosure, such
as looking through an IR window. The new standard however,
specifies that no permit is required if the enclosure
is not disturbed. |
|
One of the most relevant changes for infrared inspection
workers is associated with work permits for energized circuits.
Previously, the standard did not specify whether a work permit
was required for inspections that did not alter the enclosure,
such as looking through an IR window. The new standard however,
specifies that no permit is required if the enclosure is not
disturbed.
The NFPA 70E advocates a complete arc flash hazard analysis
prior to inspection of electrical equipment. In the event that
a complete analysis has not been completed, the HRC serves
as a guide for both workers and managers in selecting proper
levels of PPE.
A hazard/risk category rating of 3 has been
assigned to “perform(ing) infrared thermography and other non-contact
inspections outside the restricted approach boundary” which
is equal to “opening hinged covers (to expose bare, energized
electrical conductors or circuit parts)” on 1kV to 38kV switchgear.
Where the removal of bolted covers is required to allow for
inspection of equipment still carries a category 4 hazard/risk
ratings in most applications which are 600V and higher.
back to top
Best Practices in Infrared Inspection
Many practices can reduce the risk of injury while inspecting
electrical equipment. A good preventive maintenance program
will reduce the risk of an arc flash occurring from dirty or
failing components. Preventive maintenance programs should
require that equipment be thoroughly cleaned regularly and
have routine inspections performed by properly trained personnel.
Further reductions in risk can be realized through a proper
worker training program on safety.
To further mitigate risk the NFPA 70E recommends that a Hazard/Risk
analysis to determine the shock and arc flash boundaries, be
conducted prior to working on or inspecting electrical equipment,
which must be conducted by a qualified electrical engineer.
The flash protection boundary is based on the voltage, available
fault current, and the time it takes for the protective device
to operate and clear the fault and is considered to be the
safe approach distance from energized equipment or parts.
Additionally, a Hazard/Risk analysis will determine the proper
level of PPE to be used by inspectors, in addition to determining
the voltage to which personnel will be exposed. Shock protection
boundaries are identified as either limited, restricted, or
prohibited for various distances associated with various voltages.
The NFPA 70E Table 130.7-C9a provides guidelines for most situations
where a complete analysis cannot or has not been completed.
Some applications will always require an analysis prior to
inspection.
It is generally acknowledged that one
of the safest and most effective ways to inspect electrical
equipment is thermal imaging. Thermal imaging provides a
hands-off approach to inspection and can identify problems
that may not be identifiable through traditional means.
Infrared
cameras can be used to locate and identify problems in electrical
systems and have been commonplace in inspection for many years.
One of the typical symptoms of system problems is overheating
in connections and conductors. Overheating can occur as the
result of increased resistance, loose or corroded connections,
or simply load imbalances. In these cases, an infrared camera
can quickly and easily identify these problems from a safe
distance. In addition to preventing accidents, thermal imaging
can reduce down time caused by equipment failure and increase
overall safety.
Over
the last few years, infrared camera technology has provided
for greater resolution in images. This allows for thermal inspection
of smaller parts and connections within the systems. Additionally,
larger areas can be inspected while maintaining resolution
and provides for a better picture of the systems health as
a whole. Rather than having to look at several images of one
system a single image can be captured easing analysis of of
captured images.
Additionally, fusing of thermal/visible images
can be used to provide an easy-to-read image. This process
fuses an infrared image with a standard image to aid in viewing
of the images. Fusing of thermal/visible images makes the
image easier to read by giving the parts not being inspected
a more traditional look and allows the reader to focus on the
inspected parts.
One
of the biggest obstacles to thermal imaging for inspections
is cabinet design. Thermal inspections are more effective when
performed on systems that are under peak or heavy loads and
require complete line of sight access to the systems being
imaged often-requiring inspectors to open cabinets or enclosures
and providing a higher level of risk to inspectors, and is
counter to the methods suggested by NFPA 70E.
To
counter these problems infrared windows can be installed and
eliminate many of the risks associated with live inspections
of electrical systems. Infrared windows allow inspectors to
inspect the systems without the need to open up the enclosures,
thus reducing risk and PPE requirements levels as the enclosure
remains closed. Inspection via these windows can eliminate
99% of the arc flash triggers while conducting a thermal inspection
because the enclosure remains closed.
back to top
The inspection of live electrical systems is dangerous and
accidents can be serious or even fatal. The danger levels associated
with electrical systems inspections can be mitigated dramatically
by utilizing proper safety techniques and thermal imaging inspections.
Thermal imaging offers the ability to remain outside safety
boundaries while identifying problems within a system. The
advent of new higher resolution infrared cameras also allows
for the inspection of smaller parts from greater distances.
The addition of installed infrared windows in enclosures can
further reduce the risks and requires fewer workers for inspections.
- For a complete understanding and a review
of the NFPA 70E, visit the NFPA website at http://www.nfpa.org/aboutthecodes/AboutTheCodes.asp?DocNum=70E.
- “NFPA-70E 2009 and the IR Professional”,
The Snell Group, 2009.
IMAGE USAGE SOURCES
EWB
Engineering, LLC (Electrical Engineers), Arc
Flash Information Resource Center, A+
Electrical Safety Equipment, Locators
and Supplies, Inc.,The
Electricity Forum, Construction
Book Express, and Dolphins
Software. |